In the collection Physics and computation
What is the black hole information paradox?
Hawking's calculation implies that black holes destroy information as they evaporate, which conflicts with quantum mechanics. Most physicists now think information survives, but how is debated.
AI-drafted from web search results. A second, independent AI read 3 of its 4 cited pages and flagged the points below. This thread is waiting for a person to review it.
- Partly supported: The claim regarding a physicist writing in MIT's departmental magazine cannot be verified because Source 4 could not be loaded.
- Partly supported: The specific names of Engelhardt and Penington do not appear in the loaded text of Source 1, and Source 4 could not be loaded.
- Balance: The section labeled 'disputed' does not present the competing positions, who holds them, or the evidence supporting them, explicitly stating that the proposals are not described in detail.

The short answer
The black hole information paradox is an unsolved problem that appears when general relativity and quantum mechanics are combined. In the 1970s Stephen Hawking showed that a black hole emits radiation and can evaporate completely. His calculation suggested that the radiation carries no record of what fell in, which would mean that information is permanently lost. That conflicts with a core rule of quantum physics called unitarity. [1] [2]
How the conflict arises
Hawking realized that at an event horizon, which can be crossed only inward, two virtual particles can become separated. One falls in and the other radiates away with some energy, so the black hole shrinks. Hawking found that this radiation depends only on the black hole's mass, electric charge and angular momentum. Many different initial states share those values, so many starting situations would end in the same final radiation. A black hole formed from a library and one formed from a featureless rock would look alike. [2] [1] [3]
In quantum mechanics, a system's wave function evolves through a unitary operator, so the wave function at one moment can in principle determine the past and the future. Information destroyed by a black hole would break that rule. A physicist writing in MIT's departmental magazine argues that this would be an unprecedented loss of determinism, since no other known process causes net information loss. [1] [4]
Why a burning notebook is different
A notepad thrown into a fire seems to lose its message, but with perfect knowledge of every molecule and the exact equations governing them, one could in principle reconstruct the message from the ash. Evaporating black holes appear different. The MIT account says the radiation must be thermal and indistinguishable between any two evaporated black holes, so even complete knowledge of the final state would not reveal what went in. [4]
The same account notes that gravity at the horizon of a large black hole such as M87 is weaker than at the Sun's surface, so ordinary semiclassical gravity should work there. That leaves two unappealing options: strong quantum gravity effects in places that look ordinary, or a non-deterministic physics. [4]
Where researchers stand now
In 1993 Don Page argued that if evaporation is unitary, the entropy of the radiation should rise and then fall back to zero, a shape now called the Page curve. Hawking's calculation instead gives an entropy that rises until evaporation ends. It is now generally believed that information is preserved, and for many researchers, deriving the Page curve is equivalent to solving the puzzle. [1]
In 2019, two sets of researchers, one including Engelhardt and colleagues and another by Penington, reported a different semiclassical analysis consistent with the Page curve. Even so, views differ on exactly how Hawking's original calculation should be corrected, and the problem remains an active area of quantum gravity research. The search results do not describe the competing proposals in detail. [4] [1]
Timeline
- 1970sStephen Hawking shows black holes emit radiation and can evaporate completely
- 1993Don Page argues unitary evaporation implies the entropy shape now called the Page curve
- 2019Engelhardt and colleagues, and Penington, report analyses consistent with the Page curve
Drawn from the dates given in this thread.
Sources
- Black hole information paradox (en.wikipedia.org) Found by source search. Not checked by a person.
- Do black holes explode? The 50-year-old puzzle that challenges quantum physics | Nature (nature.com) Found by source search. Not checked by a person.
- Maths in a minute: The information paradox | plus.maths.org (pass.maths.org) Found by source search. Not checked by a person.
- BLACK HOLE (physics.mit.edu) Found by source search. Not checked by a person.
Questions to follow next
- What is Hawking radiation and has it ever been observed?
- What is the Page curve and why does it matter?
- How might quantum gravity resolve the information paradox?